← See all articlesJean-françois BerthetJean-françois Berthet - Jul 5, 2025

Comparison: Flutter vs .NET MAUI

.NET MAUI Logo

Introduction

In recent years, the rise of cross-platform frameworks has profoundly transformed mobile development strategies. Companies seek to reduce costs, share skills, and accelerate delivery cycles, while maintaining high standards for quality, performance, and user experience.

In this context, two approaches stand out:

  • Flutter, backed by Google, based on Dart, with a declarative UI approach and a proprietary rendering engine.
  • .NET MAUI (Multi-platform App UI), evolution of Xamarin by Microsoft, integrated into the .NET and C# ecosystem.

This article offers an in-depth comparative analysis of these two solutions, aimed at tech leads and mobile developers facing architectural or stack choices in their projects.

The goal is to clearly identify the strengths, weaknesses, and preferred use cases of each technology, through a set of key criteria: productivity, performance, native integration, maintainability, ecosystem, and more.

Note : we chose not to include React Native in this comparison, to focus the analysis on two contrasting but emerging approaches in different technological contexts. React Native will be the subject of a dedicated article, allowing for a broader evaluation later.

Whether you are in the scoping phase, redesigning a mobile app, or seeking a unified technical foundation across platforms, this comparison aims to provide you with an objective and directly usable framework for making the right decisions.

General presentation of the Frameworks

Before diving into the detailed comparative analysis, it is essential to lay the groundwork by presenting the two frameworks on fundamental aspects: publisher, main language, year of creation, target platforms, technical approach, and some reference application examples.

These generalities help to better understand the DNA of each technology, their strategic positioning , and the ecosystems in which they fit. They also provide a first level of insight to anticipate possible affinities with a team's skills or a project's constraints.

.NET MAUI (Multi-platform App UI)

  • Created by : Microsoft
  • Language : C# (and XAML for UI)
  • Year of creation:Stable versionMay 23, 2022 (with .NET 6), Major improvements : with .NET 7 (November 2022) and .NET 8 (November 2023)
  • Target : Android, iOS, macOS, Windows
  • Approach : Wrapper over native controls with a shared codebase
  • Reference applications : NBC Sports, Bitwarden, Azure Mobile app, SportsEngine, Microsoft 365 Admin

Flutter

  • Created by : Google
  • Language : Dart
  • Year of creation:Stable version 1.0 : December 4, 2018, Flutter 2.0 (web and desktop beta support): March 3, 2021,Flutter 3.0 (stable support for Android, iOS, Web, macOS, Windows, Linux): May 11, 2022 (Google I/O)
  • Target : Android, iOS, Web, Desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux)
  • Approach : Custom rendering (Skia) with native-like widgets
  • Reference applications : Google Pay, Alibaba, eBay, Reflectly, SNCF Connect

.NET MAUI (Multi-platform App UI)

.NET MAUI Logo

The .NET (.NET MAUI) cross-platform application user interface is a cross-platform infrastructure for building native mobile and desktop applications with C# and XAML. It is the successor to Xamarin.Forms, integrated into the .NET 6+ ecosystem.

With .NET MAUI, you can develop applications that run on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows from a single shared codebase.

General Architecture

  • Language : C# (with XAML or code-behind)
    • Strongly typed, object-oriented language.
    • Uses .NET 6/7/8+with the MAUI SDK.
    • UI via XAML (similar to WPF/UWP) or in C# fluent code.
  • MAUI Structure :
    • Shared UI (.xaml or .cs)
    • Shared back-end (C#, services, models)
    • Handlers : abstractions to access native controls.
    • Blazor Hybrid : allows using Razor/HTML/CSS for the interface.
.NET MAUI Architecture

.NET MAUI is intended for developers who want to:

  • Write cross-platform applications in XAML and C#, from a single shared codebase in Visual Studio.
  • Share UI layout and design across multiple platforms.
  • Share code, tests, and business logic across multiple platforms.

Development Environment

IDE : Visual Studio 2022/2023 (Windows required for Android/iOS, Mac required for iOS/macOS build)
Tools :
  • MAUI CLI (`dotnet new maui`, `dotnet build`, etc.)
  • Hot Reload (XAML/C#)
  • Debugger, Live Preview, XAML Live Visual Tree
  • Integrated device simulators (Android/iOS)
.NET MAUI Display

Android Emulator

The Android emulator is directly integrated into Visual Studio and simulates an Android device on your computer. It allows you to launch, test, and debug applications without using a real physical device.

Android SDK, Android Emulator, AVD Manager (included with Visual Studio when you install MAUI for Android).

.NET MAUI Emulator

UI Development

  • UI in XAML (declarative, similar to WPF)
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    <ContentPage xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/dotnet/2021/maui"
                 xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
                 x:Class="Notes.AboutPage">
      <VerticalStackLayout Spacing="10" Margin="10">
        <HorizontalStackLayout Spacing="10">
          <Image Source="dotnet_bot.png"
                 SemanticProperties.Description="The dot net bot waving hello!"
                 HeightRequest="64" />
          <Label FontSize="22" FontAttributes="Bold" Text="Notes" VerticalOptions="End" />
          <Label FontSize="22" Text="v1.0" VerticalOptions="End" />
        </HorizontalStackLayout>
        <Label Text="This app is written in XAML and C# with .NET MAUI." />
        <Button Text="Learn more..." Clicked="LearnMore_Clicked" />
      </VerticalStackLayout>
    </ContentPage>
  • And in C#
        private async void LearnMore_Clicked(object sender, EventArgs e)
        {
            // Navigate to the specified URL in the system browser.
            await Launcher.Default.OpenAsync("https://aka.ms/maui");
        }

State Management and Logic

  • Recommended MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel) pattern
  • Use of `INotifyPropertyChanged`, `Command`, etc.
  • Compatible with `CommunityToolkit.Mvvm`

There are three main components in the MVVM model: the model, the view, and the view model. Each serves a distinct purpose. The diagram below shows the relationships between the three components.

.NET MAUI MVVM Pattern

At a higher level, the view "knows" the view model, and the view model "knows" the model, but the model is unaware of the view model and the view model is unaware of the view. Thus, the view model isolates the view from the model and allows the model to evolve independently of the view.

Navigation

  • Via `Shell` (`AppShell.xaml`) for centralized navigation
  • `Routing.RegisterRoute()` and `GoToAsync()`

API Calls and Persistence

  • HTTP via `HttpClient`
  • JSON serialization with `System.Text.Json` or `Newtonsoft.Json`
  • Storage:
    • `Preferences` (key/value)
    • `SecureStorage` (encryption)
    • SQLite (via `sqlite-net-pcl`)
    • EF Core (with SQLite for mobile)

Tests

  • Unit tests: `xUnit`, `NUnit`
  • UI tests: with `MAUI.UITest` (preview) or Appium
  • Mock : `Moq`, `FakeItEasy`

Build & Deployment

  • Visual Studio offers build for each platform
  • `dotnet publish` / `dotnet build`
  • Integration with Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, CI/CD
  • Deployment to Play Store / App Store / Microsoft Store

Publishing possible directly from Visual Studio…

.NET MAUI Visual Studio publish menu

Creation and signing of the package for distribution

.NET MAUI allows you to generate:

  • APK (old format) or
  • AAB (Android App Bundle) (format recommended by Google).
.NET MAUI Archive Manager.NET MAUI Archive Manager Distribute.NET MAUI Distribution Select Channel Ad Hoc

Documentation

Flutter

.Flutter

Flutter is an open-source UI framework developed by Google for creating native multi-platform applications with a single codebase. It uses the Dart language and offers custom graphics rendering via its own engine.

General Architecture

  • Language: Dart
    • Object-oriented language, compiled to native code (JIT & AOT).
    • Syntax similar to JavaScript and Java/C#.
    • Package manager: pub.dev.
  • Key components:
    • Widgets : Everything is a widget (UI, layout, animation, etc.).
    • State Management : Several solutions:
      • setState (basic)
      • Provider, Riverpod, Bloc, Cubit, GetX, etc.
    • Flutter Engine : C++ engine rendering via Skia.
    • Platform Channels : Allows calling native code (Kotlin, Swift, etc.).

Development Environment

  • Recommended IDEs:
    • Android Studio
    • Visual Studio Code
    • IntelliJ IDEA
  • Tools:
    • Flutter CLI (`flutter doctor`, `flutter build`, `flutter run`, etc.)
    • Hot Reload: instantly updates the UI without restarting the app.
    • Dart DevTools: debugging, performance, logs, widget inspector.
Flutter IDE

UI Development

Flutter enables pixel-perfect design , with many capabilities:

  • MaterialApp, Scaffold, AppBar, Container, Row, Column, Stack
  • Highly composable custom components
  • Responsive design withLayoutBuilder, MediaQuery, Flexible

State Management

Depending on your project's complexity:

  • Simple → setState
  • Medium → Provideror Riverpod
  • Complex → Bloc, Cubit, Clean Architecture

Navigation

  • Native (Navigator, Navigator 2.0)
  • With packages like:
    • go_router
    • auto_route

API Calls and Persistence

  • HTTP:http, dio, chopper
  • Local storage:
    • shared_preferences (key-value)
    • sqflite (SQLite)
    • hive (fast NoSQL)
  • Authentication : Firebase, OAuth, etc.

Firebase

Integrating Firebase into a Flutter application offers many advantages, whether for development, user management (password, recovery, email sending…), FCM notifications, or Google Analytics.

Firebase offers a set of packages maintained and optimized for Flutter (firebase_core, firebase_auth, cloud_firestore, etc.).

Advantages of Firebase integration :
DomainAdvantage
AuthenticationFast multi-provider integration
DataReal-time NoSQL database
NotificationsEasy cross-platform push
AnalyticsUser behavior insights
StorageSecure file management
PerformanceCrashlytics, Remote Config, App Check
DeploymentApp Distribution and CI/CD support

Tests

  • flutter test for unit tests
  • flutter_driver or integration_test for integration tests
  • mockito, bloc_test for mocking and logic verification

Build & Deployment

  • flutter build apk / flutter build ios / flutter build web
  • Integration with GitLab CI/CD, GitHub Actions, Codemagic, etc.
  • Use of Flavors for multi-environment dev/uat/prod management flutter run --flavor dev

Documentation

Framework Comparison

After setting the general framework, let's get to the heart of the comparison . We analyzed Flutter and .NET MAUI according to the most decisive technical criteria for mobile development teams: portability, performance, UX, productivity, backend integration, and learning curve.

Each strength is put into perspective with the structural or contextual limitations specific to each framework: language, maturity, native experience, or testing and deployment constraints.

The goal : to provide a clear and pragmatic framework to guide your technology choices according to your project's specific challenges.

Advantages

CriterionFlutter.NET MAUI
🌍 PortabilityTruly cross-platform (mobile, web, desktop)Multi-platform but not yet for Web
🧱 UI/UXFull control thanks to the Skia rendering engine. Homogeneous UI across all platformsNative UI (thanks to wrappers), so very "OS-specific" feel
🚀 PerformanceVery smooth as rendering is independent (no native bridge)Good performance but depends on the native layer
🔁 Hot ReloadVery fast and stableAvailable but less responsive than Flutter's
🌐 EcosystemLarge community, wide choice of packages (pub.dev)Integrated into the .NET ecosystem (NuGet, Azure, etc.)
🧠 Learning curveEasy to learn for front-end developersEasy if you already know C# and .NET
📦 Backend IntegrationGood integration with Firebase, REST, GraphQL, etc.Very good integration with the Microsoft ecosystem (.NET, EF, Azure, etc.)

Disadvantages

CriterionFlutter.NET MAUI
🔤 Dart LanguageLess popular, harder to recruit developersC# is widely used, especially in enterprises
📚 OS DocumentationFewer native APIs exposed directly (need plugins or channels)Native integration, but sometimes complex depending on the platform
🧪 MaturityStable, but some platform-specific bugsStill young (replacement for Xamarin.Forms), sometimes unstable
📱 Native UINot "real native", may lack precise native behaviorsBased on native components, so more consistent with the OS
🧩 App sizeBinaries are larger (Skia embedded)More optimized size (depending on OS)
🧪 Unit testingLess support for native UI testsVery good support with Visual Studio tooling

Specific Comparison

Beyond use cases and developer profiles, certain technical and ecosystem aspects can strongly influence the choice between Flutter and .NET MAUI .

This table highlights the concrete differences on key points for teams :tooling, deployment, portability, and architecture paradigms.

This comparison allows you to quickly assess the framework's compatibility with existing tools, as well as the expected learning curve based on development habits. It is especially useful for multi-platform projects or those integrated into advanced CI/CD cycles.

AspectFlutter.NET MAUI
Preferred IDEVS Code, Android StudioVisual Studio 2022+
CI/CD IntegrationGitHub Actions, Codemagic, GitLab CIAzure DevOps, GitHub Actions
Web SupportYesNo
Linux Desktop SupportYesUnofficial / experimental
Navigation / RoutingFlexibility with GoRouter, etc.Classic XAML navigation
Recommended ArchitectureBloc, Provider, RiverpodMVVM (.NET standard)

Choice by Developer Profile

Beyond technical or functional criteria, the available developer profile and the existing ecosystem play a key role in choosing a cross-platform framework. Good alignment between internal skills and the chosen technology helps reduce ramp-up time, limit project risks, and maximize productivity from the first iterations.

The table below offers a pragmatic recommendation based on developer profile or team context, to facilitate adoption and optimize project success.

Developer profileRecommendation
Front-end developerFlutter (easier to approach)
Experienced .NET / C# developer.NET MAUI
Need Web + MobileFlutter
Project with Microsoft ecosystem (Azure, SQL Server).NET MAUI
Target Linux/DesktopFlutter

Concrete Use Cases

In a context where mobile and desktop applications must be delivered faster, on more platforms, and with ever higher experience quality, choosing a cross-platform development framework has become a strategic issue.

Among modern options,Flutter and.NET MAUI stand out as two solid candidates, but their philosophies, strengths, and target use cases differ significantly.

This document offers a concise overview of these differences through concrete use cases, to inform decisions based on business, technical, and organizational context.

Conclusion

In summary, Flutter and.NET MAUI are two powerful frameworks for cross-platform application development.

Flutter stands out for its fast development, its broad compatibility with many devices, and the support of an active community.

Conversely, .NET MAUI is particularly suited for projects that leverage the .NET ecosystem, with a familiar language (C#) and excellent integration with Microsoft tools.

The choice between the two depends primarily on the specific needs of the project, the team's skills, and the tools and technologies already in place.

Main criterionBest choice
Fast developmentFlutter
PerformanceFlutter
Native system integration.NET MAUI
.NET backend required.NET MAUI
Web port includedFlutter
Smooth learning curve for .NET devs.NET MAUI
MaturityFlutter
UI design and visualsFlutter